WASHINGTON — President Trump unveiled a sweeping and aggressive new policy toward Iran on Friday, saying he will not re-certify the nuclear deal signed in 2015 and calling for a variety of new sanctions against the government in Tehran.
“The Iran deal is one of the worst and one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into,” Trump said during a speech at the White House.
Saying the Islamic government in Tehran is dedicated to “death, destruction, and chaos all around the globe,” Trump announced that the United States is starting sanctions against Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, which he called a supporter of international terror. The president also said he has started an investigation into whether Iran is cooperating with North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
But while Trump formally announced his decision to begin backing out of the multinational agreement, he also did not ask Congress to re-impose economic sanctions right away; instead, he called for new requirements on Iran in an effort to “strengthen enforcement” of the agreement he has long criticized.
“In the event we are not able to reach a solution working with Congress and our allies, then the agreement will be terminated,” Trump said.
The new approach to the nuclear agreement is part of an overall strategy to deal with the Iranian “dictatorship,” Trump said.
The president repeatedly criticized Iran’s Islamic government, saying it has spread “death, destruction, and chaos all around the globe,” from the 1979 takeover of the U.S. embassy to shooting protesters in the streets.
He also accused them of seeking to evade the requirements of the nuclear deal, even though officials in the Trump administration and other countries say Iran has been in at least technical compliance.
Trump faced a Sunday deadline to certify the agreement. Every 90 days, the president must certify that Iran is in compliance of the deal.
The president decertified the agreement despite statements by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and other officials that Iran has “technically” held up its end of the bargain.
In outlining Trump’s new approach to Iran, Tillerson told reporters that the goal is to strengthen the deal: “Let’s see if we can address the deficiencies that exist within this agreement.”
Tillerson added that “we may be unsuccessful,” and “we may not be able to fix the deal.” He added that Trump himself is “not particularly optimistic” about the prospect.
Analysis: What Trump’s move on the Iran deal means
Uncertainty over Iran nuclear agreement could heighten economic tensions with Europe
The U.S. signed the agreement in 2015 along with Russia, China, Germany, France and Great Britain. The European signatories have urged Trump to re-certify it and questioned whether Iran would go along with any new provisions.
Under the agreement, the U.S. and allies reduce sanctions on Iran in exchange for Tehran giving up its nuclear weapons program.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who says Iran’s nuclear program has always been designed for peaceful energy purposes, has said that the U.S. walking away would damage international trust of the U.S.
“Every word was analyzed many times by countries involved before its ratification,” Rouhani told NBC News in September, “so if the United States were to not adhere to the commitments and trample upon this agreement, this will mean that it will carry with it the lack of subsequent trust from countries towards the United States.”
And allies fear that killing the agreement could prompt Iran to resume its nuclear weapons program, perhaps triggering a nuclear arms race throughout the Middle East.
Trump aides said their approach to the Iran nuclear deal is part of an overall strategy designed to confront the Tehran government over what they call its bad behavior, including support for terrorism and efforts to destabilize other countries.
As part of that strategy, Trump announced news sanctions on Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, describing it as a special “terror force.”
While the nuclear agreement is flawed in the administration’s view, Tillerson said it is “only one part of what concerns us” about Iran.
De-certification would not kill the deal outright; that would be up to Congress.
Lawmakers have three options, Tillerson said: Do nothing and refuse to slap new sanctions on Iran, thereby keeping the existing deal alive; re-impose economic sanctions, effectively killing the agreement; or push for new negotiations for additions that Trump believes will “put more teeth” in the demands on Iran.
One possible provision would be adding “trigger points,” new rules that would lead to an immediate re-imposition of sanctions if Iran violates them. One example, Tillerson said, would be development of prohibited ballistic missiles.
Some U.S. officials also want to eliminate “sunset provisions” in the existing agreement, which allow Iran to resume its nuclear program after a decade or more.
It is not clear whether U.S. allies or Iran would be willing to engage in new talks, much less a new agreement.
Trump has signaled his de-certification move for months, siding with critics who say the 2015 agreement gives Iran too much room to cheat, even as they profit from the elimination of economic sanctions.
“I think it was one of the most incompetently drawn deals I’ve ever seen,” Trump told Sean Hannity in an interview taped Wednesday. “We got nothing, we got nothing. They got a path to nuclear weapons very quickly.”
Despite similar attacks on the agreement, Trump has agreed to re-certify twice already this year, drawing criticism from some supporters who are also suspicious of Iran’s intentions.
Tillerson pointed out that Trump, while attacking the agreement, has also said he would be willing to see it strengthened.
In his speech on Friday, Trump called on Congress to change the law requiring him to make a certification statement to Congress every 90 days.
White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said it is only one part of an overall strategy “to deal with all of the problems of Iran being a bad actor.”
Since before taking office in January, Trump and his aides have criticized Iran’s ballistic missile program, as well as what they call its support for terrorism and efforts to de-stabilize other Middle Eastern countries, including Iraq, Yemen, and Syria.
They have also cited Iranian threats toward Israel, a notably vocal opponent of the nuclear agreement.
Supporters note that inspection organizations have said Iran is in compliance with the demands of the existing agreement.
Trump and aides have said that Iran may be living up to the letter of the agreement — “we don’t dispute that they are under technical compliance,” Tillerson said — but argued that the deal overall is flawed and Iran’s de-stabilizing activity in the region undermines the spirit of the agreement.
Tillerson and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster said they have discussed their new Iran approach with members of Congress. While a new agreement may not be possible, they said some lawmakers have been receptive, and improving the agreement is worth a try in any case.
Said McMaster: “Nobody’s for Iran getting nuclear weapons.”
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2wRH8bD